🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – going beyond who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and has become a kind of well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in readership and most voters favored Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the system every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of votes that came in later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday went somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani added half a million votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse, young, tenants and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president previously backed Zohran this year. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to get over half. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he does so then no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost any district in any area. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly surprised me. The independent kept very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many conservatives on Staten Island with a high participation. I think occurred significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there was a little resistance. However overall, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key figures from the left come from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in America can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.